SELECTED RESERVE ENLISTED ACCESSIONS AND ENLISTED FORCE
Representation Within Occupations.
The assignment of Reserve Component personnel to occupations is based
upon individual qualifications and desires, military requirements, and
unit vacancies. The changing missions of the Armed Services, including
domestic and international humanitarian efforts, affect personnel assignment.
Table 5.15 shows the occupational area distribution of Reserve and Active
Components.
Table
5.15. Comparison of FY 2004 Reserve and Active Enlisted Occupational
Areas (Percent) |
Occupational
Code and Area |
Reserve |
Active |
0 |
Infantry, Gun Crews, and Seamanship Specialists |
16.2 |
17.1 |
1 |
Electronic Equipment Repairers |
4.5 |
8.8 |
2 |
Communications and Intelligence Specialists |
5.1 |
9.4 |
3 |
Medical and Dental Specialists |
6.1 |
6.8 |
4 |
Other Allied Specialists |
3.1 |
2.9 |
5 |
Functional Support and Administration |
19.4 |
15.9 |
6 |
Electrical/Mechanical Equipment Repairers |
15.9 |
20.7 |
7 |
Craftsmen |
5.8 |
3.7 |
8 |
Service and Supply Handlers |
12.3 |
9.2 |
9 |
Non-occupational* |
11.5 |
5.6 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Table 5.16 indicates that the occupational distribution among Active
and Reserve Components varies. The differences reflect each Reserve Component's
unique mission requirements and force structure, which may preclude some
direct transfers from active duty to the National Guard and Reserve within
the same skill. For example, 26 percent of active Army enlisted members
serve in the infantry, but the Army Reserve has only 8 percent in this
skill area. On the other hand, only 16 percent of active Army enlistees
serve in administration while 26 percent of USAR enlistees serve in administration.
Similar occupational differences are found in each Service component.
Some occupational areas may not be able to absorb all transfers, while
other areas may have to recruit more NPS individuals to fill unit vacancies
or retrain those with prior service. The occupational distribution percentages
for FY 2004 are relatively similar to those of FY 2003.
Table
5.16. Comparison of FY 2004 Occupational Area Distribution of Enlisted
Members, by Active and Reserve Components (Percent) |
Active and Reserve Components |
Occupational
Area* |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
ARMY
Active Component
Army National Guard
Army Reserve |
25.9
23.7
7.5 |
6.4
3.2
2.0 |
11.2
5.6
3.8 |
7.9
3.9
10.0 |
3.4
2.9
3.9 |
15.7
14.3
25.6 |
14.0
13.7
11.0 |
1.8
4.1
5.9 |
12.9
12.7
18.8 |
0.9
15.9
11.7 |
NAVY
Active Component
Naval Reserve |
9.4
10.0 |
12.7
10.4 |
9.3
7.5 |
8.4
8.9 |
1.2
0.8 |
11.5
22.2 |
28.2
18.9 |
5.7
14.2 |
6.7
6.6 |
7.0
0.6 |
MARINE CORPS
Active Component
USMC Reserve |
23.0
30.9 |
6.8
3.6 |
7.2
7.9 |
0.0
0.0 |
2.6
1.3 |
16.1
12.3 |
16.1
13.5 |
2.6
3.2 |
12.6
15.2 |
13.0
12.2 |
AIR FORCE
Active Component
Air National Guard
USAF Reserve |
9.8
9.4
10.7 |
9.0
9.3
4.8 |
8.1
4.1
3.1 |
7.3
4.3
10.7 |
4.0
4.8
3.5 |
20.7
21.6
26.6 |
24.6
27.6
21.6 |
4.8
6.2
5.9 |
5.0
6.3
5.2 |
6.8
6.5
7.8 |
|
previous
| next
Summary
| Contents | Search
| Download | Links
| FAQ | Home
Introduction | Enlisted
Accessions | Enlisted Force
| Officers | Reserve
Enlisted
Reserve Officers | U.S.
Coast Guard | Appendix Tables
|