 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
SELECTED RESERVE OFFICER ACCESSIONS AND OFFICER CORPS This
chapter describes demographic characteristics of Selected Reserve officer
accessions and commissioned officers in FY 2000.[footnote
1] The total officer accessions for
Reserves decreased in FY 2000 (from 17,447 in FY 1999 to 15,097 in FY
2000). Similarly, the size of the officer corps decreased from 124,309
in FY 1999 to 120,865 in FY 2000. Figure 6.1 shows the Reserve Component
officer corps end-strengths for FYs 1974 to 2000.
Figure
6.1. Reserve Component officer corps end-strength, FYs 19742000.
Table 6.1 compares the number and proportion of Reserve officer accessions with the officer corps. The ARNG and the USAR account for the largest proportion of Selected Reserve officers. The two Army components comprise 56 percent of Reserve officer accessions and 57 percent of Reserve officer end-strength. With the exception of the ARNG and USMCR, accessions decreased for all components in FY 2000. End-strength decreased in the ARNG, USAR, USNR, and USMCR, but increased in the Air Force components, ANG and USAFR.
[footnote 1] Data are for commissioned officers; warrant officers are excluded. A brief look at Reserve Component warrant officers is provided in Appendix Tables C-34 and C-35. [back to paragraph] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||