CHAPTER
5
Characteristics of Selected Reserve Accessions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY 1999 Reserve
Component recruiting results for NPS and prior service gains and assigned
end-strengths are shown in Table 5.1. In FY 1999, the Reserve Component
recruited 143,855 enlisted persons compared to the Active Component's
almost 184,000. The ARNG has the largest Reserve Component recruiting
program, followed by the Army Reserve (USAR). The ARNG recruited nearly
29,000 NPs enlistees, approximately 15,000 more than the USAR. However,
the USAR recruited just over 30,000 prior service recruits, nearly 2,000
more than the ARNG. Recognizing the importance of experience provided
by qualified prior service personnel to the Reserve Forces, Congress
established additional prior service accessions for the ARNG as part
of the Army Guard Combat Reform Initiative: "The Secretary of
the Army, shall increase the number of qualified prior active-duty enlisted
members in the Army National Guard."
[1]
While the legislation applies only to the ARNG, the Secretary
of the Army has required the Army Reserve to comply, which would explain
the large number of prior service accessions to the USAR and the ARNG. Selected Reserve
recruiting achievements decreased by approximately 2,000 enlisted accessions
from FY 1998 to FY 1999 (from almost 146,000 to nearly 144,000). The
Army National Guard and the Naval Reserve increased while all other
components experienced cuts. Due to differences in mission and force structure, the size of recruit cohorts by component varied greatly. Therefore, comparisons between the Reserve Component percentages must be interpreted with care. The Army Componentsthe ARNG and USARhad the largest Selected Reserve recruit cohorts, recruiting 70 percent of total Reserve Component accessions (40 and 30 percent for the ARNG and USAR, respectively) in FY 1999. The Naval Reserve (USNR) and Air Force Reserve (USAFR) had the highest proportion of prior service recruits (85 percent and 82 percent of their total recruiting efforts, respectively). The Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) had the lowest proportion of recruits with past military experience (39 percent). Prior service accessions provide the Reserve Component with a more experienced personnel base, contributing to increased readiness to meet future missions.
The increase in
availability of prior service recruits, a temporary phenomenon due to
the larger number of active duty members leaving service during the
drawdown, has ended. The result is fewer prior service individuals
from which the Reserve Component can recruit. In fact, the more successful
the Military Services are in retaining active duty members, the smaller
the prior services pool becomes. Thus, the Reserve Component must recruit
NPs individuals, in direct competition with the Active Component. The
numerical effects of the drawdown, changes in the Reserve mission with
increased combat risks due to an increased operating tempo (OpTempo),
as well as quality of life and compensation issues have made Reserve
recruiting difficult as we enter the 21st century. Potential
recruits are likely to find combat risk, family hardships, and financial
losses during a mobilization more important in the Reserve participation
decision today and in the future."
[2]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
back | next | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||